Saturday, 8 June 2013

SUPREME COURT ENDOSES LIVE COVERAGES FOR PUBLIC INTEREST, ---BUT TSATSU TSIKA ASKS FOR CNN, BBC TO ASSIST GTV









By Felix Engsalige Nyaaba
 Accra, April 17, 2013
 By a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court yesterday endorsed the live telecast of the substantive matter of the ongoing election petition case.
The petitioners are three leading members of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) comprising its 2012 presidential candidate Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, his running mate Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia and the party’s chairman, Jake Otanka Obetsebi-Lamptey.
They are challenging the legitimacy of President John Dramani Mahama, the winner of the 2012 presidential elections.
According to the court, the decision to allow the premier television station, the GTV to telecast the proceeding live was in the interest of justice, the public interest and for the enrichment of the country’s young but vibrant democracy.
 The nine member panel reached the decision and endorsed the live coverage of proceedings in court after all parties in the case have not raised any objection to the live coverage.
The court said, the live telecast of the proceedings would further ease the unnecessary tension and acrimony in the country since the petition was filed before the court.
“If you look in town since the this petition was brought here, you could see tension, acrimonies, we cannot allow things to go on like that, we are all been governed by the constitution and so when issues of this nature arise, we have to look at the public interest.”
“This live coverage of proceedings would also further erase any misconception of what happened in this court or during the proceeding of the case, the court held.
All parties in the case agreed for the live telecast of proceeding and have all expressed for the need of it for public interest and justice.
Philip Addison
Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Philip Addison observed that the case is an important one which has high public interest and that it is above the ordinary case in court.
He added, “ the constitution itself has endorsed that cases such as the petition is of public interest and should be open to the viewing and hearing of the public,  so we think that the  people of Ghana interest  would be best served if they could sit at homes and view or observed  proceeding in court.”
Tony Lithur
Lead counsel for the president and first respondent said, ‘ we  welcome the  live coverage of the proceeding by GTV, but we also wish and hope that other television stations in the country and international media , the CN , BBC , others would also be allow to cover the proceedings.
The EC Lawyer
Counsel for the Electoral Commission, Mr James Quashie –Idun, “we will go along with other counsel, that the proceedings be telecast live, we have no objection, but we leave the issue on the discretion of the court.”
Tsatsu Tsikata
Counsel for the NDC, Mr Tsikata said, “ we do not only heartily welcome the decision of the proceedings this nature  to be telecast live but we also wish other international la media like the CNN, Aljazeera, the South Africa TVs, and others would be allow to carry this all important case worldwide for viewers.”
He added that, “we pray and hope the court would continue to extend this to other cases that have national interest.”
By Court
“If you look in the country since this election petition case, there have been tension, acrimonies, so the issues as we decided at last sitting, we have resolved that the live coverage of the proceeding if that would so serve the interest of the public,” the court held.
The court further stated, the question of the TV live coverage’s on this case is here by popularly agreed by all parties, it would help erase the misconception by any extension by the conclusion of this case.”
The court however turned down an appeal by the petitioners to be allowed to bring in equipments to enable them present their evidence through a power point presentation.
According to the judges, they wondered what purposes or advantage that the power point presentation would add to the exhibit provided by the petitioners in their affidavits.
The Petitioners, who have named President Mahama, the Electoral Commission (EC) and the Chairman of the Commission, Dr. Kwadwo Afari Gyan and the National Democratic Congress (NDC), the political party on whose ticket President John Dramani Mahama contested the elections as respondents, are claiming the election was rigged by the EC in favor of President Mahama.
They are expected to call in their   first witness before the court today, to testify and tell the court as to how, when and where the alleged irregularities, omissions, malpractices of the 2012 elections took place.
They have the burden to prove to the Supreme Court beyond reasonable doubt that indeed the EC has defrauded the results of the election conducted on 7 and 8 December, 2012 in favour of John Dramani Mahama.
The Supreme Court has set out two issues as to whether or not there were statutory violations, omissions, irregularities and malpractices in the conduct of the elections held on December 7 and 8, 2012.
The court is also to ascertain whether or not the said violations, omissions, irregularities and malpractices (if any) affected the outcome of the results of the 2012 presidential elections.

No comments:

Post a Comment