By
Felix Engsalige Nyaaba
The Accra Regional Police Command has reiterated its
commitment to ensuring peace in the country and warned that people who do not
have accreditation ID Cards issued by the Judiciary Services would not be allow
at the premises of the Supreme court when the court resume Wednesday to hear the
presidential election petition and the contempt case against the NPP general Secretary,
Kwadwo Owusu Afriyie.
According to the regional police commander, Deputy
Commissioner of Police (DCOP) Christian Tetteh Yohonu, the police would deal
decisively with any person or group of persons who do not have accreditation to
the court but found their way into the premises of the Supreme court to cause
any form of confusing when the court resume Wednesday to hear the petition and
also hear the contempt case against the general secretary of the New Patriotic
Party (NPP).
He told The Enquirer that the regional police
command has met and resolved not to allow people to gather in groups near the
premises of the Supreme Court, adding that if the police caught up with any
group of persons at the court premises in groups without accreditation cards
would be dealt with according to the law.
The regional police command’s warning comes on the heels of some information
gathered by the paper that some people
are planning to cause disturbance at the premises of the Supreme court when
the General Secretary of the New
Patriotic Party (NPP), Kwadwo Owusu
Afriyie appear before the court over some contemptuous commends he made
against the bench.
But the regional police commander said, the police
would not entertain any form of hooliganism from any group of persons who would
disturbed the peace of the country , saying the police have a duty to by the
constitution to maintain law and order
any person who take the peace of the country for granted would face the law when
caught.
“The police would not allow any person to disturb
the peace of this country, we are meeting and further decisions would be taking
to ensure that no groups of persons are seen gather at the premises of the God.
We will not allow anybody who does not have accreditation ID card to enter,
unless such a person has a genuine business to deal with the court,” he said.
DCOP Yohonu stated that the election petition hearing was being telecast live and that there
was no need for nay person who do not have accreditation to come to the court
premises when such a persons could easily watch the proceedings at home.
He said beside the normal checks at the entrance at
the Supreme Court, the police would also monitor activities of people who
throng the court premises, adding that no persons would be allow to gather in
groups during court proceedings.
Mr. Kawdwo Owusu Afriyie, aka Sir John will appear
before the justices of the Supreme Court on Wednesday August 14, 2013, to
defend comments they made which were considered outrageous and intended to
lower the court’s authority and credibility in the eyes of the general public.The summons which was official issued on last Friday, quoted copiously from a publication of The Enquirer issue of Friday July 5, 2013 with a headline: “Sir John Descends on Justice Atuguba…Calls him a hypocrite, A joker who pampers Tsikata, Scolds Addison.”
According to the summons, The Enquirer claimed that Sir John made the comments on Oman FM on June 24, 2013 and spoke in Twi, adding that the NPP scribe per The Enquirer publication had described Justice Atuguba “as a hypocritical joker who pampers the counsel for the National Democratic Congress, Tsatsu Tsikata, but habitually scolds the counsel for the NPP,” and that the judge habitually “frowned like a voodoo deity”.
The summons further quoted newspaper as saying that Sir John had said “Justice Atuguba by his action, was up to hypocritical antics that is intended to lead NPP not to getting the opportunity to play a tape recording of Electoral Commissioner, Dr Kwadwo Afari-Gyan’s voice declaring that ‘No verification, no vote’, so that the President can win the case.”
The Supreme Court per The Enquirer publication therefore issued a summon to Sir John to come and show cause why he should not be committed to prison for contempt of the court by scandalizing the court, lowering the authority and credibility of the court in the eyes of the general public, and exciting hatred and ill will towards 1st and 2nd respondent in the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment