By
Felix Engsalige Nyaaba
The Chief Justice, Her Ladyship Mrs.
Georgina Theodora Wood, has been dragged
before an Accra Fast Track High Court for breaching the 1992 Constitution and
interfering with judicial process by reversing a High
Court decision on the contempt case between two disputing faction of the Anlo
traditional area in the Volta Region.
The application was filed on March 8, 2012, on behalf of the
applicants, Mr. Patrick Agboda, the
Awoamefia of the Anlo Traditional area and 10 others by Lithur Brew
& Co Law Firm in Accra.
The other
applicants are, Togbui Addo VIII, Togbui
Agbesi Awusu II, Togbui Gbodzor III, Togbui Honi , Nyigblanua Eha II, Dan
Abodakpi, the Ghana High Commissioner to Malaysia, Francis Segbedzi, Ben Sakpau , Agbotadua Kumassah and
Philip Kumassah.
Before the suit against the Chief Justice, the
applicants were facing contempt of court case at the Accra Fast Trach Court brought
by Lieutenant Colonel Courage Togobo (Rtd), a principal member
of the Fuiga Agbeve family of the Anloga and Adika Drafor Royal gates of the
Adzovia clan of the Anlo traditional area.
However,
during the hearing of the contempt case, lawyers for the applicants in the instance
application raised preliminary objection that the case be send back to the Ho
High Court where the original case that led to the contempt was pending.
The
Court presided over by Mr. Justice Ofori-Atta, on October 31, 2011 upheld the
objections of the Respondents in that suit that, the Accra High Court had no
jurisdiction to hear and determine the contempt proceedings.
According
to Justice Ofori Atta, the Ho High Court in the Volta Region was the convenient
forum for the contempt considering the interest and convenience of the parties
and their witnesses.
But
to the utmost surprise to the applicants herein, the Chief Justices with the
infringement of Article 296 of the 1992 Constitution under the hand of the Fast
Track High Court Registrar ordered and directed that the case be transferred
from one Fast Track High Court in Accra to another one, also in Accra.
Following that
directives by the Chief Justices, the applicants through their legal counsel,
Mr. Tony Lithur filed a motion on notice
for order in the nature of judicial review to reverse the Chief Justices unprecedented judicial
administrative order and to quash
the directive to place the contempt suit before another High Court in Accra.
The
applicants are therefore seeking the
court among others for a declaration that the Respondent’s, Her
Ladyship Justice Georgina Wood powers
under Sections 104 and 105 of the Court’s Act, 1993 (Act 459) and Order 3 Rule
2 of C.I. 47 are subject to Articles 132, 137(1) and 296 of the Constitution
1992;
It further wants a declaration that by
reversing the ruling of the Fast Track High Court, dated October 31, 2011, and
by the use of administrative powers or fiat under section 105 of the Courts
Act, 1993 (Act 459), after a judicial determination by the said ruling on the
issue of venue, the Chief Justices had thereby usurped the judicial powers of
the Superior Courts of Judicature in breach of Articles 132 and 137(1) 0f the
Constitution, 1992.
It
also wants an order quashing the directives and Orders issued by the Respondent,
the Chief Justices through the Judicial Secretary, dated the 10th
day of November, 2011.
In
an accompanying affidavit deposed off by Francis Segbedzi, the 8th respondent in the
contempt suit that, Lt. Col. Courage Togobo (Retired), the Interested Party
herein sued the applicants herein for contempt in the Fast Track High Court,
Accra.
That,
the Interested Party alleged that as a principal member of the Fuiga Agbeve
Family of the Adzovia Clan of the Anlo Traditional Area, one of the king-makers
of the Awoamefia, had filed a Petition at the Judicial Committee of the Volta
Regional House of Chiefs, challenging the eligibility of the applicants for enstooling
one Patrick Agboda as the Awoamefia of Anlo Traditional Area.
According
to the applicants in their affidavit, some delays occurred in the hearing of
the Petition and during that period, attempts were made to install Patrick Agboda
who is also applicant in the instance motion as the Awoamefia.
But
the Petitioners then caused to be filed an application for contempt at the High
Court, Ho, in the Volta Region against the applicants herein.
That
in spite of the pendency of the application for contempt, further attempts were
made to install 1st Applicant herein as the Awoamefia and another application
for injunction was then filed at the High Court Ho to arrest the installation.
It
said, the injunction application was not successfully serve on the applicants
herein and as a result the installation process therefore went ahead without the
contempt applicant being duly served, which later resulted in the institution
of the contempt proceedings at the Accra Fast Track High Court against the
eleven applicants in the instance suit.
According
to the applicants, before the application for contempt could be heard,
preliminary objections were raised to the hearing of the contempt suit in Accra
contrary to the court rules on jurisdiction.
The legal counsel objection were
that without exception, all the events based on which the contempt was
instituted occurred in the Ho High Court and the Petition against the eligibility of Patrick
Agboda as the Awomefia was also commenced before the Judicial Committee
of the Volta Regional House of Chiefs.
It further stated that, the
application for injunction which was the immediate basis for the application
for contempt was also initiated in the High Court, Ho, in the Volta Region, and
that most of the Respondents to
the contempt proceedings as well as the
witnesses that may be required in proof or rebuttal of the allegations, lived
and worked in the Volta Region.
The applicants through their legal
counsel argued that with respect, the most convenient forum for the contempt
application was the Volta Region and that there was no conceivable reason why
the contempt suit was instituted in Accra in the Greater Accra Region.
However,
in a ruling dated October 31, 2011, the Presiding Judge, His Lordship Mr.
Justice Ofori-Attah, upheld the objections of the Respondents, with the reason that
Accra had no jurisdiction to hear and determine the contempt proceedings.
The
applicants therefore said, even though the provisions of the
Constitution, the Chief Justice may by order signed by the Chief Justice
transfer a case from a Judge or Magistrate or Tribunal to any other Judge or
Magistrate and from one court to any other competent court at any time or stage
in the course of proceedings, the
exercise by the Chief Justice of her powers of transfer may be limited
depending on the situations under Sections 104 and 105 of Act 459.
It
further argued that, the power to order the transfer vested in the Respondent
qua Chief Justice, are been conferred on her as the administrative
head of the judicial arm of government and that the Applicants do not seek to challenge the
existence of that power.
The
exercise by Respondent of those powers, whether under Section 104 or 105 of Act
459 or under Order 3 Rule 2 of C.I. 47, are administrative in nature, vested in
her to be used in the proper management of the judicial arm of government.
In that sense, its exercise is not in the nature
of judicial determination and, therefore, cannot be described as the exercise
of judicial power.
The
applicants said, in refusing to transfer the suit in accordance with the ruling
of Justices Ofori-Attah, the Respondent did breached the 1992 Constitution and that the court must
review it own decision and quashed the directive of the Chief Justice.
The
right to be heard in a dispute that involves two or more parties is a
fundamental ingredient of the adversarial system of justice and when parties
exercise their rights in that regard in arguing their respective cases before a
court of competent jurisdiction, and a ruling is delivered, they expect the
outcome to be sacred unless set aside on an appeal or any other judicial mechanism
provided under the laws of the country.
That
applicants contended that, the Constitution is the highest legal instrument and
is the highest source of law and that other statutory instruments are subordinate
to the Constitution and the powers the CJ may have under Act 459 and C.I. 47
cannot override constitutional provisions that provide for modes of reversing judicial
decisions taken by courts of competent jurisdiction.
It
however, noted that in reversing the judicial decision of a court of competent
jurisdiction in the manner in which the Chief Justice did, she had, in her
administrative capacity, transformed herself into a Court of Appeal or Supreme
Court over the ruling of the High Court and that her conduct cannot be said to
be the intent behind Sections 104 and 105 of Act 459 or indeed Order 3 Rule 2
of C.I. 47.
It
therefore concluded that the Chief Justice by her orders reversed the
“judgment”, delivered by a court of competent jurisdiction; she had by
administrative fiat, usurped the role of duly constituted appellate courts in
favour of one disputing party and has thereby breached the 1992 Constitution
and interfered with judicial process.
this CJ intefers in our laws too much, i think she should resign by now
ReplyDelete